Article

LTGG Reflections: The value of culture

July 2024 / 4 minutes

Why looking beyond financial statements matters.

The past four years have tested corporate resilience and adaptability. Financial markets like certainty and calculability. Comfort has been found in lengthy cash runways and low levels of leverage. Yet, these aspects of resilience feel like table stakes, hygiene factors upon which the rest of the market will also be focused.

We believe a lot of our insight comes from taking a different view of what matters; how we weigh qualitative or intangible factors. A skill we’ve been honing for more than 20 years. Back in 2004, the fourth question of our investment research framework demanded "Are your people consistently better than their people? If so, why and at what?" In 2013, this evolved to ask "Is the business culture clearly differentiated? Is it adaptable?"

Three business people in discussion sitting on colourful seats, overhead view.

Our belief is that, while notably absent from financial statements, culture ultimately determines corporate decision-making. It is responsible for motivating employees to show up day after day to seize and create opportunities. And in the face of a rapidly changing world, a culture that effectively adapts will thrive, not merely survive. Are these not the very levers of value creation?

How then do we quantify the value of a differentiated company culture?

 

Three measures we take

The first step we take is to consider a company’s actions, not its words. Any business can create a narrative around itself, but it is how it operates that defines the values of the enterprise.

Our visit to e.l.f. Beauty’s understated headquarters in Oakland, California was affirmative of the brand’s focus on value for money, and the plucky outsider element to their culture. Interestingly, both the CFO and Senior Vice President of Operations, unprompted, spoke about the fact that they were the first in their families to attend college and that finding an inspiring senior management team with similar backgrounds was a large part of the appeal of joining. Both came across as humble but ambitious to change the industry. One such initiative is e.l.f Beauty’s pursuit to “Change the Board Game.” Its campaign “So many dicks” highlights how there are more men named Dick (Richard, Rich and Rick) on publicly traded boards than entire groups of underrepresented people, agitating that it is in the interest of profitability for corporate America to push for change.

Second, we look at how companies communicate or think of themselves. While most companies are now required by regulation to report some form of quarterly numbers, there is no direction on how they view or commentate on these short periods of time. We instinctively trust those who have a vision of where they would like to get their business over the next decade rather than those who revert to a Gartner-style third-party report on the total addressable market (TAM).

Adyen has been a recent victim of not running on the quarterly hamster wheel. A quirk of its Netherlands domicile is six-monthly reporting. This sits well with a management team that is resolutely long-term. But shares have seen precipitous falls when short-term profits have been forfeited in favour of countercyclical investment in engineering staff or take rate has compressed due to operational leverage being shared with merchants. During our regular updates, we learned from the co-CEOs that they adopt a very clear pace of recruitment to ensure culture doesn’t atrophy and talent density is maintained. In turn, we fed back that providing capital markets with more directional guidance around near-term developments between reporting cycles should reduce informational vacuums and the likelihood of the market extrapolating short term developments.  

Related to this is the third method – getting as deep as you can into an organisation. There is little to be learned from a highly polished Investor Relations professional with a tight corporate script. Rather, insights come from long-serving employees who are less experienced in communicating with investors and, therefore, possess veracity.

Our reputation as long-term, supportive shareholders grants us significant access. Earlier this year, we had the opportunity to sit down with Spotify's co-presidents to discuss the recent organizational changes that have enabled significant reductions in the company’s operating cost base. The pair, who rarely grant shareholders time, explained that the recent fine-tuning of a previously radically decentralised structure has resulted in greater alignment and prioritisation of initiatives while retaining developer autonomy and innovation. This helped us to gain comfort that recent cuts were addressing existing organisational bloat, but we remain cognisant that Spotify is yet to prove sustainable monetisation of its platform, and our reduction of the holding size, following share price strength, reflects this.

Pulling this together, there is no eureka moment at which a company’s culture is revealed, rather it is a constant learning process, where each interaction and iteration provides a piece of the mosaic. Equally, we never have a full picture because the companies themselves are changing in terms of size, people, and opportunity sets.

 

Culture in the face of change

Which brings us on to adaptability. With a view to invest in companies for five, ten, twenty years, Long Term Global Growth requires adaptability from its portfolio holdings. We, therefore, look for companies that are open to change and willing to experiment. It is no coincidence that the portfolio’s R&D spend as a percentage of revenue (15 per cent) is three times that of the index. Nor should it be a surprise that several holdings have reinvented themselves during our holding period, be it Amazon’s book sales only comprising 10 per cent of revenues in 2023 or NVIDIA’s gaming segment shrinking to just 17 per cent of the total revenue over the last twelve months.

Jensen Huang recently celebrated three decades as NVIDIA’s chief executive. A remarkable achievement. His success can in part be attributed to a strategy he describes as “failing forward”—taking a chance on something new, admitting when it isn’t working, adjusting, and then pressing onwards, becoming better every time. This mindset allowed for significant investments into developing its software proposition, CUDA, well ahead of competitors. Fast forward to today, more than three million developers use the platform, and it has become one of its most significant sources of competitive advantage.  

When thinking about culture in this way, founder and family-owned companies have always appealed. They comprise more than 70 per cent of portfolio weight. Why? The primary motivation is often to pass their business on to future generations from a position of strength, a motivation that drives attitudes, incentives, and time horizons that align with those of our clients.

Looking back at some of the sales of the portfolio over the years, the decision to move on has stemmed from a deterioration of these factors. Illumina provides a recent example, where strategic decisions, such as the repurchase of GRAIL ahead of regulatory approval and letting innovation slow, compromised the company’s position of relative strength. After prolonged engagement with the company, we took the decision to move on, especially given the degree of competition for capital in the portfolio.

A strong culture alone won’t determine the success of an investment, but a close examination of culture may help us avoid making some of the inevitable mistakes that growth investing entails. Culture is the intangible glue that can hold fast-growing businesses together. It is the facilitator that gives space for innovation and the standard behind which companies can emerge stronger from adversity. 

Annual past performance to 30 June each year (net %)
   2020 2021 2022  2023  2024 
LTGG Composite 56.4 61.7 -48.9 24.2 21.4
MSCI ACWI 2.6 39.9 -15.4 17.1 19.9
Annualised returns to 30 June 2024 (net %)
  1 year 5 years 10 years Since inception*
 LTGG Composite 21.4 14.2 14.5 12.1
 MSCI ACWI 19.9 11.3 9.0 8.3

*Inception date 29 February 2004.

Source: Baillie Gifford & Co and MSCI. US Dollars.

Past performance is not a guide to future results. Changes in the investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of the portfolio. Net of fees returns have been calculated by reducing the gross return by the highest annual management fee for the composite. All investment strategies have the potential for profit and loss.

Risk factors

The views expressed should not be considered as advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a particular investment. They reflect opinion and should not be taken as statements of fact nor should any reliance be placed on them when making investment decisions.

This communication was produced and approved in August 2024 and has not been updated subsequently. It represents views held at the time of writing and may not reflect current thinking.

Potential for profit and loss

All investment strategies have the potential for profit and loss, your or your clients’ capital may be at risk. Past performance is not a guide to future returns.

This communication contains information on investments which does not constitute independent research. Accordingly, it is not subject to the protections afforded to independent research, but is classified as advertising under Art 68 of the Financial Services Act (‘FinSA’) and Baillie Gifford and its staff may have dealt in the investments concerned.

All information is sourced from Baillie Gifford & Co and is current unless otherwise stated.

The images used in this communication are for illustrative purposes only.

Important information

Baillie Gifford & Co and Baillie Gifford & Co Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Baillie Gifford & Co Limited is an Authorised Corporate Director of OEICs.

Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited provides investment management and advisory services to non-UK Professional/Institutional clients only. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford & Co. Baillie Gifford & Co and Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited are authorised and regulated by the FCA in the UK.

Persons resident or domiciled outside the UK should consult with their professional advisers as to whether they require any governmental or other consents in order to enable them to invest, and with their tax advisers for advice relevant to their own particular circumstances.

Financial intermediaries

This communication is suitable for use of financial intermediaries. Financial intermediaries are solely responsible for any further distribution and Baillie Gifford takes no responsibility for the reliance on this document by any other person who did not receive this document directly from Baillie Gifford.

Europe

Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Ltd (BGE) is authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland as an AIFM under the AIFM Regulations and as a UCITS management company under the UCITS Regulation. BGE also has regulatory permissions to perform Individual Portfolio Management activities. BGE provides investment management and advisory services to European (excluding UK) segregated clients. BGE has been appointed as UCITS management company to the following UCITS umbrella company; Baillie Gifford Worldwide Funds plc. BGE is a wholly owned subsidiary of Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited, which is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford & Co. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and Baillie Gifford & Co are authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Hong Kong

Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited 柏基亞洲(香港)有限公司 is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and holds a Type 1 license from the Securities & Futures Commission of Hong Kong to market and distribute Baillie Gifford’s range of collective investment schemes to professional investors in Hong Kong. Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited 柏基亞洲(香港)有限公司 can be contacted at Suites 2713–2715, Two International Finance Centre, 8 Finance Street, Central, Hong Kong. Telephone +852 3756 5700.

South Korea

Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is licensed with the Financial Services Commission in South Korea as a cross border Discretionary Investment Manager and Non-discretionary Investment Adviser.

Japan

Mitsubishi UFJ Baillie Gifford Asset Management Limited (‘MUBGAM’) is a joint venture company between Mitsubishi UFJ Trust & Banking Corporation and Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited. MUBGAM is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Australia

Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited (ARBN 118 567 178) is registered as a foreign company under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and holds Foreign Australian Financial Services Licence No 528911. This material is provided to you on the basis that you are a “wholesale client” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (“Corporations Act”).  Please advise Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited immediately if you are not a wholesale client.  In no circumstances may this material be made available to a “retail client” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act.

This material contains general information only.  It does not take into account any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs.

South Africa

Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is registered as a Foreign Financial Services Provider with the Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa.

North America

Baillie Gifford International LLC is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited; it was formed in Delaware in 2005 and is registered with the SEC. It is the legal entity through which Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited provides client service and marketing functions in North America. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is registered with the SEC in the United States of America.

The Manager is not resident in Canada, its head office and principal place of business is in Edinburgh, Scotland. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is regulated in Canada as a portfolio manager and exempt market dealer with the Ontario Securities Commission (‘OSC’). Its portfolio manager licence is currently passported into Alberta, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Newfoundland & Labrador whereas the exempt market dealer licence is passported across all Canadian provinces and territories. Baillie Gifford International LLC is regulated by the OSC as an exempt market and its licence is passported across all Canadian provinces and territories. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited (‘BGE’) relies on the International Investment Fund Manager Exemption in the provinces of Ontario and Quebec.

Israel

Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is not licensed under Israel’s Regulation of Investment Advising, Investment Marketing and Portfolio Management Law, 5755–1995 (the Advice Law) and does not carry insurance pursuant to the Advice Law. This material is only intended for those categories of Israeli residents who are qualified clients listed on the First Addendum to the Advice Law.

MSCI Legal Disclaimer

Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, endorsed, reviewed or produced by MSCI. None of the MSCI data is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such.

114000 10049142