This article is archived and some details may be out of date.
Article

The Indian economy’s ‘missing’ female workers

October 2021

Key points

A drop in the percentage of women engaged in India’s workforce presents challenges and opportunities to firms including Vedantu, Meesho and Zomato, as investment analyst Abhishek Parajuli explains.

© Getty Images Plus.

Stand on a footbridge during rush hour in almost any major commercial city and you’ll see a similar scene: traffic slowed to a crawl, frustration boiling over, the occasional flare-up of road rage.

This is true of Delhi’s commute too. But there is one big difference. If you peered into the cars travelling across the Indian capital, you’d soon notice that almost all the workers were men. 

Only 21 per cent of Indian women work in its formal economy, according to the World Bank. Even within the Sensex 30 group of India’s 30 largest companies, women make up just 27 per cent of the workforce. 

What’s more, the figures have worsened over time. In 1990, the workforce participation rate of India’s women was 30 per cent. The drop since then is a big problem for India as it aspires to emulate South Korea and China, but in fact measures closer to Pakistan and Morocco on this metric.

This puzzle is perplexing as women’s education in India has improved. Female literacy rose from 40 per cent in 1991 to 70 per cent in 2018. University enrolment has also increased. So why are fewer women working even as they become more skilled? 

As you would expect, the answer is complicated, but two reasons stand out. Firstly, Indian women mostly work in sectors that have shrunk or stalled. Take agriculture – its contribution to India’s GDP has declined while manufacturing and services have grown. Women have struggled to escape farming and get a foothold in manufacturing. So, as agriculture shrank, so did women’s work.

The service sector in India has boomed. But the professions where women dominate – including nursing and teaching – have not grown as fast as male-dominated ones. In fact, women get less than 19 per cent of the jobs in India’s 10 fastest growing occupations. 

Secondly, studies suggest that rising family incomes have, perversely, pushed women out of the workforce. India is a patriarchal society, where having the financial heft to keep women at home improves a family’s social status. So, as India’s economy grows and family incomes rise, more wives are leaving work. 

Amazon v Reliance

But why should investors care? 

The employment gap means industries may evolve differently in India than elsewhere. Take online groceries. One reason people internet shop is to save time. But if women aren’t spending hours of their day at work and commuting, then time is less of a constraint.

This could affect corporate fortunes. Reliance and Amazon are battling for dominance in Indian e-groceries using, essentially, two different strategies. Reliance is more focused on partnering with the small neighbourhood stores called Kiranas, where most Indians buy groceries. Amazon is betting big that Indians want doorstep deliveries. 

If the extra time Indian women have makes them less willing to pay more for home drop-offs, the home-grown firm has the advantage. But if households still prize convenience over all else, then the US ecommerce giant has the better strategy. Thinking about the employment gap raises questions that might matter. 

The employment gap also exposes opportunities. Vedantu provides after-school classes via the internet. Many are group activities with up to 350 pupils in one class, but the company wants to offer more one-to-one tutorials. In most countries, that would be an expensive endeavour. But the ed-tech firm can tap into India’s huge pool of educated but unemployed women.

Another business harnessing this opportunity is Meesho, an online store for women’s clothing and accessories. The majority of its 15 million resellers are women, running home-based businesses through their social networks. Meesho is essentially a mobile-first ‘Indian Shopify’ and it has seen meteoric growth.

Food delivery firm Zomato – listed in July. Its key rival, Swiggy, will eventually float too. Could their market be smaller than analysts expect because so many women are at home and have both the time and social pressure to cook? Zomato and Swiggy’s revenues are both growing quickly and they have ambitious expansion plans, but asking how things might be different in India is useful.

© Shutterstock.

ESG scores

There are implications for ESG investing too. Say you read 35 per cent of an Indian company’s staff are female. Without context, you’d likely label it a laggard. With knowledge, you might laud its achievement, before nudging it to do more. Companies don’t operate in vacuums and ESG metrics should reflect this.

Finally, India pays a macroeconomic price. It’s hard to quantify the lost potential, but consultants at McKinsey estimate that its GDP would be 18 per cent larger by 2025 if it matched best-in-Asia Singapore, where 62 per cent of women are employed. That equates to a $770bn gain.

To get anywhere near that level requires a cultural shift involving radical changes to societal expectations and the opportunities available to India’s working-age women.

But for now, investors who keep in mind India’s gender employment gap can gain an added perspective on its many companies and the opportunities they present.

© David Talukdar/NurPhoto/Getty Images.

Important Information

Baillie Gifford & Co and Baillie Gifford & Co Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Baillie Gifford & Co Limited is an Authorised Corporate Director of OEICs.

Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited provides investment management and advisory services to non-UK Professional/Institutional clients only. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford & Co. Baillie Gifford & Co and Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited are authorised and regulated by the FCA in the UK. 

Persons resident or domiciled outside the UK should consult with their professional advisers as to whether they require any governmental or other consents in order to enable them to invest, and with their tax advisers for advice relevant to their own particular circumstances.

Europe

Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited provides investment management and advisory services to European (excluding UK) clients. It was incorporated in Ireland in May 2018 and is authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland. Through its MiFID passport, it has established Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited (Frankfurt Branch) to market its investment management and advisory services and distribute Baillie Gifford Worldwide Funds plc in Germany. Similarly, it has established Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited (Amsterdam Branch) to market its investment management and advisory services and distribute Baillie Gifford Worldwide Funds plc in The Netherlands. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited also has a representative office in Zurich, Switzerland pursuant to Art. 58 of the Federal Act on Financial Institutions (‘FinIA’). It does not constitute a branch and therefore does not have authority to commit Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited. It is the intention to ask for the authorisation by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) to maintain this representative office of a foreign asset manager of collective assets in Switzerland pursuant to the applicable transitional provisions of FinIA. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited, which is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford & Co.

China

Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Shanghai) Limited 柏基投资管理(上海)有限公司(‘BGIMS’) is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and may provide investment research to the Baillie Gifford Group pursuant to applicable laws.  BGIMS is incorporated in Shanghai in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’) as a wholly foreign-owned limited liability company with a unified social credit code of 91310000MA1FL6KQ30. BGIMS is a registered Private Fund Manager with the Asset Management Association of China (‘AMAC’) and manages private security investment fund in the PRC, with a registration code of P1071226.

Baillie Gifford Overseas Investment Fund Management (Shanghai) Limited 柏基海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(‘BGQS’) is a wholly owned subsidiary of BGIMS incorporated in Shanghai as a limited liability company with its unified social credit code of 91310000MA1FL7JFXQ. BGQS is a registered Private Fund Manager with AMAC with a registration code of P1071708. BGQS has been approved by Shanghai Municipal Financial Regulatory Bureau for the Qualified Domestic Limited Partners (QDLP) Pilot Program, under which it may raise funds from PRC investors for making overseas investments.

Hong Kong

Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited 柏基亞洲(香港)有限公司 is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and holds a Type 1 and a Type 2 license from the Securities & Futures Commission of Hong Kong to market and distribute Baillie Gifford’s range of collective investment schemes to professional investors in Hong Kong. Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited 柏基亞洲(香港)有限公司 can be contacted at Suites 2713–2715, Two International Finance Centre, 8 Finance Street, Central, Hong Kong. Telephone +852 3756 5700.

South Korea

Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is licensed with the Financial Services Commission in South Korea as a cross border Discretionary Investment Manager and Non-discretionary Investment Adviser.

Japan

Mitsubishi UFJ Baillie Gifford Asset Management Limited (‘MUBGAM’) is a joint venture company between Mitsubishi UFJ Trust & Banking Corporation and Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited. MUBGAM is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Australia

Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited (ARBN 118 567 178) is registered as a foreign company under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and holds Foreign Australian Financial Services Licence No 528911. This material is provided to you on the basis that you are a ‘wholesale client’ within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (‘Corporations Act’). Please advise Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited immediately if you are not a wholesale client. In no circumstances may this material be made available to a ‘retail client’ within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act.

This material contains general information only. It does not take into account any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs.

South Africa

Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is registered as a Foreign Financial Services Provider with the Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa. 

North America 

Baillie Gifford International LLC is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited; it was formed in Delaware in 2005 and is registered with the SEC. It is the legal entity through which Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited provides client service and marketing functions in North America. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is registered with the SEC in the United States of America.

The Manager is not resident in Canada, its head office and principal place of business is in Edinburgh, Scotland. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is regulated in Canada as a portfolio manager and exempt market dealer with the Ontario Securities Commission (‘OSC’). Its portfolio manager licence is currently passported into Alberta, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Newfoundland & Labrador whereas the exempt market dealer licence is passported across all Canadian provinces and territories. Baillie Gifford International LLC is regulated by the OSC as an exempt market and its licence is passported across all Canadian provinces and territories. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited (‘BGE’) relies on the International Investment Fund Manager Exemption in the provinces of Ontario and Quebec.

Oman 

Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited (‘BGO’) neither has a registered business presence nor a representative office in Oman and does not undertake banking business or provide financial services in Oman. Consequently, BGO is not regulated by either the Central Bank of Oman or Oman’s Capital Market Authority. No authorization, licence or approval has been received from the Capital Market Authority of Oman or any other regulatory authority in Oman, to provide such advice or service within Oman. BGO does not solicit business in Oman and does not market, offer, sell or distribute any financial or investment products or services in Oman and no subscription to any securities, products or financial services may or will be consummated within Oman. The recipient of this material represents that it is a financial institution or a sophisticated investor (as described in Article 139 of the Executive Regulations of the Capital Market Law) and that its officers/employees have such experience in business and financial matters that they are capable of evaluating the merits and risks of investments.

Qatar

The materials contained herein are not intended to constitute an offer or provision of investment management, investment and advisory services or other financial services under the laws of Qatar. The services have not been and will not be authorised by the Qatar Financial Markets Authority, the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority or the Qatar Central Bank in accordance with their regulations or any other regulations in Qatar.

Israel

Baillie Gifford Overseas is not licensed under Israel’s Regulation of Investment Advising, Investment Marketing and Portfolio Management Law, 5755–1995 (the Advice Law) and does not carry insurance pursuant to the Advice Law. This material is only intended for those categories of Israeli residents who are qualified clients listed on the First Addendum to the Advice Law.

 

10906 10002627

About the authors