Capital at risk
Actual investors help shape the new world. Not shore up the old one.
- You can often find the best growth opportunities among the disruptive businesses of tomorrow
- It’s too easy for long-established companies to underinvest in innovation, allowing upstarts to change the market and render them obsolete
- Actual investors look for risk-taking companies with the imagination to shape future markets
In 1997, the Harvard Business School management guru Clayton Christensen described the ‘innovator’s dilemma’. He explained why well-run companies that excel in satisfying their customers eventually get pushed aside by disruptive companies exploiting new technologies.
Even if they do everything right, Professor Christensen argued, big companies can find it hard to move with the times. Their day-to-day efforts are naturally focused on refining their businesses and responding to customer demand. Why should they spend time and resources experimenting with niche products and markets posing no visible threat?
New products make a new world
Meanwhile, earlier-stage companies are often much freer to pioneer new technologies and experiment with new business models. Undistracted, they can develop entirely new approaches to provide the products and services that will serve the needs of tomorrow’s customers. By testing these offerings in a small target market and by envisioning their wider appeal, the likes of Airbnb, Spotify, Amazon, and Skype made deep inroads into long-established, profitable industries as diverse as hospitality, music, book publishing and telecoms. The new world they created came about when dominant companies were slow to spot how new products could please consumers. By the time they did, the disruptors’ technology or competitive position were too far ahead.
The speed of disruption is accelerating as human ingenuity is boosted by computer processing power and improved artificial intelligence. An accelerated wave of change is hitting new areas of everyday life, from consumer products to public services such as healthcare and education. In this new world, seemingly unassailable companies become vulnerable.
Even long-established and seemingly impregnable strongholds can crumble if they underinvest in their own future in response to the insatiable short-termism of the stock market. The pressure on companies to maintain payouts to shareholders via dividends or buying back stock – sometimes even borrowing to do so – can be intense. Reinvesting current cash flow to generate far-distant revenues, even where there is plainly a good opportunity, all too often results in a share price fall. And those far-distant revenues aren’t always so far off: academic evidence shows that company management often forego projects that have payback periods of as little as three years.
Investing in the future
At Baillie Gifford, we actively seek out companies that can reinvest cash flows at high rates of expected return, so capturing the phenomenal power of compound growth. Increasingly, we provide primary capital to early-stage companies as they build their business, sometimes before they are even profitable.
Companies that pay today’s investors out of yesterday’s business are of little interest to Actual, long-term investors. However well-crafted or well-marketed their offering is, if they’re merely shoring up the old world, it’s hard to see them surviving into the long term, let alone outperforming over Baillie Gifford’s preferred long time-horizons.
In sectors as diverse as oil and gas, car manufacturing, retail and pharmaceuticals, some companies are simply not capable of adapting to the new world, so great is their reliance on legacy technologies and business models that are being superseded. For Actual investors, it’s the new, unencumbered players that are more likely to achieve long-term growth – and to change peoples’ behaviours in big ways and small.
Looking for the disruptors
Our job is to seek out the businesses shaping this new world. We find them more often among disruptive new entrants than among past champions attempting to reinvent themselves. There are exceptions: Netflix, for example, was a video hire business that killed its own business model by developing on-demand streaming, achieving extraordinary success. But the big businesses capable of reinvention are more likely to be those with disruption in their DNA. Perhaps the best-known example is Amazon. Not content with upending consumer behaviour, it saw an opportunity to become a leader in the adjacent area of cloud computing services. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is now its most profitable division.
Investing in new-world companies takes curiosity, knowledge, imagination and a long-term perspective. Actual investors build relationships and encourage the companies we invest in to take risks, invest in their future, and create businesses built to beat the competitors of tomorrow, not today.
Actual insights in your inbox
Offering you insights from our fund managers, on topics ranging from the changing face of growth to the energy transition.
Important information
The content of this website is intended exclusively for professional investors in accordance with MiFID legislation. ’Professional investors’ are potential investors who are deemed to have the status of “professional clients”, within the meaning of MiFID (2004/39/EC), as transposed in Ireland. It is not intended for retail investors.
Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland (Reference number C182354) as an Alternative Investment Fund Manager and UCITS Manager to Baillie Gifford Worldwide Funds plc. Its registered office is 4/5 School House Lane East, Dublin 2, D02 N279, Ireland.
This website is informative only and the information provided should not be considered as investment or other advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a particular investment. Read our Legal and regulatory information for further details.
Any stock examples, or images, used on this website are not intended to represent recommendations to buy or sell, neither is it implied that they will prove profitable in the future. It is not known whether they will feature in any future portfolio produced by us.