Key points
The International All Cap Team shares insights on Q4 2024, covering the strategy's recent performance, portfolio adjustments, and market influences.
Your capital is at risk.
As 2025 approaches, we wanted to write to recognise that investment performance has not met our expectations, but also that the portfolio of companies is in very good shape with higher margins and returns on capital and lower leverage than the index. These metrics, set out in the table below, combined with exposure to powerful long-term trends and attractive starting valuations, give us confidence that the portfolio can compound growth at high rates over many years. Examples of companies in the portfolio that are attractively valued are numerous and prolific – Greggs (UK food outlet), Bunzl (global distribution company) and Intertek (outsourced testing business) are all on around 18-20x headline earnings, and we expect double digit growth from all of these.
Portfolio characteristics
International All Cap | MSCI ACWI ex US | |
Gross Margin (%) | 34.9 | 26.2 |
EBIT Margin (%) | 13.9 | 11.4 |
Return on Equity (%) | 17.4 | 12.6 |
Return on Invested Capital (%) | 11.2 | 7.2 |
Net Debt to EBITDA (x) | 0.5 | 1.5 |
Net Debt to Equity (x) | 0.2 | 0.4 |
Source: FactSet, MSCI. As at 30 November 2024. US dollar.
Based on a representative portfolio.
Underlying company fundamentals remain very strong, however, this has not yet been translated into outperformance relative to the benchmark for the overall portfolio. While our clients remain supportive, and understand and believe in our long-term approach, we are quite reasonably being asked in what environment our performance will improve.
We thought it might be helpful to give our perspective on the investment environment of recent years and importantly set out for you where we expect strong performance to resume.
Firstly, we want to make clear that we have learned lessons from the experience of the last 3-4 years. We sent our clients a paper in the first half of the year setting out how we are putting more resource behind risk management and portfolio construction and how this has fed through to modifications in our process.
A blueprint for growth?
One area of the portfolio that has performed very well over the last twelve months has been in the cluster of online platform companies that have demonstrated an ability to monetise their strong market positions; this group includes Autotrader, Shopify, Recruit and Spotify, among others. Just one year ago these were out of favour and had detracted from performance over the medium term. As with all our holdings, we tracked their progress carefully (and indeed we sold out of some online platforms where we felt the businesses had deteriorated) but for those where we had conviction, we held on and in some cases added to the position. We highlight this example because it illustrates the potential latent value that can exist in out-of-favour sectors, and how quickly the market can turn in their favour (Shopify is now up 86 per cent from its bottom less than six months ago).
The companies above provide a blueprint for what we might expect from the broader portfolio. Strong revenue growth, particularly as the cycle improves, should be met by margin expansion as companies benefit from operating leverage. The result, in our estimation, will be much faster earnings growth across the portfolio than the market currently expects.
The tide will turn…
We want to highlight three areas where we have active exposures that have been a headwind in recent years, but which are cyclical rather than structural. We believe that when the cycle turns, as it inevitably will, the impact on portfolio returns will be significant.
Japan
Firstly, the performance of our Japanese holdings has been particularly painful. In part this is related to investment style. In early 2022 with the invasion of Ukraine and resurgent inflation there was a sharp market rotation from ‘growth’ to ‘value’. Material and energy stocks and interest rate sensitive stocks performed well, while longer duration names and quality compounders underperformed. This was a global phenomenon but in the Japanese market this rotation was particularly pronounced and has been much longer lasting, driven by country specific factors including uncertainty around governance improvements and a very weak currency. Our holdings in higher quality growth businesses which benefit relatively less from balance sheet restructuring or the ‘oxygen’ of a weak currency, have been left behind in this environment. However, we believe that once the governance improvements have been digested and when a convergence in interest rates causes the yen to stabilise or even strengthen, quality growth businesses will once again come back into focus, and given weak starting valuations, their share prices should reflect operational performance and growth prospects.
Within the portfolio, there are plenty of examples of the higher quality growth businesses described above. We would highlight Murata, which has a world-leading position in certain components used in communication devices, Sysmex, which develops and supplies diagnostic instruments, and Shimano, which primarily produces very high-quality cycling components, as compelling flag carriers. In addition, the likes of Nippon Paint is delivering double digit EPS growth, taking market share in most markets, but trades on a mid-teens PE ratio – we don’t expect this clear mismatch to continue indefinitely.
Industrial recovery…
Secondly a sustained industrial recovery would benefit several of our industrial equipment companies. While any equipment related to AI has been booming this year, in other areas such as smartphones, computers, and biopharma there have been some false starts but no sustained recovery. Partly this is because of excess inventory stored up during times of COVID related supply chain disruption and partly because higher rates choked off financing for certain areas. We believe that as inventories are digested, and a replacement cycle kicks in for various sectors, industrial equipment and capex exposed areas of the portfolio will perform strongly. This process of recovery has taken longer than we thought it would, but the legacy of COVID lockdowns means this has been an unusual industrial cycle. We are confident that when a recovery comes through, many of the companies we hold will experience not only a recovery in earnings but a reappraisal of their prospects, which will be reflected in higher valuations. Indeed, we have added holdings to our industrial ‘bucket’ where we think that future prospects are not reflected in the valuations.
A good example from this category is Soitec, the performance-engineered semiconductor wafers manufacturer. The company has guided that sales have bottomed out and that the recovery in demand is picking up strongly as its customers restock inventories. Soitec’s end demand is largely in cell phones and, therefore, it stands to reason that it moves with different cycles to some of the other semiconductor-related companies we hold.
The return of the emerging markets consumer
Thirdly a recovery in the emerging market consumer and particularly the Chinese consumer would be positive for performance. It has been painful to continue our hold positions in luxury goods, cosmetics, and certain beverages categories this year, and we have been disappointed that the emerging market consumer has remained so weak. In hindsight we were too optimistic about a resumption in consumer activity after the disruption of lockdowns. However, in the long term, we believe that a growing middle-class consumer is an important global mega trend that will persist beyond the next decade. As bottom-up stock pickers we continue to revisit the investment cases for all our holdings and have exited from consumer holdings where we think brand strength has weakened but we have also taken new holdings in this sector where we see attractive opportunities in the long term.
When the recovery does gather pace, and the Chinese consumer regains ground, the impact on the fortunes of luxury goods companies such as LVMH and Richemont could be incredibly meaningful.
Strong Long-term Foundations
While we believe the case for the portfolio is strong over the medium-term, we think it is even stronger over the long-term. The portfolio contains exposure to powerful secular trends, such as the integration of technology in industrial applications, the growth of AI and semiconductor capex, and the emerging middle class across fast growing economies. As we enter a more benign economic environment, we think the market’s focus will return to the micro over the macro, favouring companies with the ability to generate value over prolonged periods.
Finally…
This letter is not meant as a list of excuses for underperformance. We have made mistakes and are committed to learning from them. The important point for us is that we have specific groups of high-quality, attractively valued businesses across the portfolio, including in the areas that have proven difficult in recent times. We can already see an improvement in the backdrop and in the fundamentals of these businesses, and we believe that portfolio performance will turn accordingly.
The Portfolio Construction Group enters 2025 positive, focused and optimistic about the broad opportunity set available at extremely attractive starting points. An investment trip to Switzerland in the first week of January helps to underline this point.
We thank our clients for their continued support and patience. We genuinely believe that this will be repaid to you via re-establishing a track record of outperformance through careful, thorough and considered stock picking.
This is an International All Cap commentary based on ACWI ex US All Cap. Not all stocks may be held, but themes of this commentary are representative of: EAFE Plus All Cap and Developed EAFE All Cap.
|
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
ACWI ex US All Cap Composite |
33.2 |
3.2 |
-32.0 |
10.4 |
2.9 |
MSCI ACWI ex US Index |
11.1 |
8.3 |
-15.6 |
16.2 |
6.1 |
EAFE Plus All Cap Composite |
28.2 |
3.8 |
-30.9 |
9.8 |
1.2 |
Developed EAFE All Cap Composite |
27.3 |
7.4 |
-32.2 |
10.1 |
-0.6 |
MSCI EAFE Index |
8.3 |
11.8 |
-14.0 |
18.9 |
4.3 |
|
1 year |
5 years |
10 years |
ACWI ex US All Cap Composite |
2.9 |
1.2 |
4.7 |
MSCI ACWI ex US Index |
6.1 |
4.6 |
5.3 |
EAFE Plus All Cap Composite |
1.2 |
0.4 |
4.2 |
Developed EAFE All Cap Composite |
-0.6 |
0.3 |
4.2 |
MSCI EAFE Index |
4.3 |
5.2 |
5.7 |
The International All Cap Strategy comprises three distinct variants. Overall, the variants are broadly similar, with the key difference being the degree of exposure to emerging markets listed holdings.
Source: Revolution, MSCI. US dollar. Returns have been calculated by reducing the gross return by the highest annual management fee for the composite. 1 year figures are not annualised.
Past performance is not a guide to future returns.
Legal notice: MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, endorsed, reviewed or produced by MSCI. None of the MSCI data is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such.
Risk factors
This communication was produced and approved in January 2025 and has not been updated subsequently. It represents views held at the time and may not reflect current thinking.
The views expressed should not be considered as advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a particular investment. They reflect opinion and should not be taken as statements of fact nor should any reliance be placed on them when making investment decisions.
This communication contains information on investments which does not constitute independent research. Accordingly, it is not subject to the protections afforded to independent research, but is classified as advertising under Art 68 of the Financial Services Act (‘FinSA’) and Baillie Gifford and its staff may have dealt in the investments concerned.
All information is sourced from Baillie Gifford & Co and is current unless otherwise stated.
The images used in this communication are for illustrative purposes only.
Important Information
Baillie Gifford & Co and Baillie Gifford & Co Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Baillie Gifford & Co Limited is an Authorised Corporate Director of OEICs.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited provides investment management and advisory services to non-UK Professional/Institutional clients only. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford & Co. Baillie Gifford & Co and Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited are authorised and regulated by the FCA in the UK.
Persons resident or domiciled outside the UK should consult with their professional advisers as to whether they require any governmental or other consents in order to enable them to invest, and with their tax advisers for advice relevant to their own particular circumstances.
Financial Intermediaries
This communication is suitable for use of financial intermediaries. Financial intermediaries are solely responsible for any further distribution and Baillie Gifford takes no responsibility for the reliance on this document by any other person who did not receive this document directly from Baillie Gifford.
Europe
Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Ltd (BGE) is authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland as an AIFM under the AIFM Regulations and as a UCITS management company under the UCITS Regulation. BGE also has regulatory permissions to perform Individual Portfolio Management activities. BGE provides investment management and advisory services to European (excluding UK) segregated clients. BGE has been appointed as UCITS management company to the following UCITS umbrella company; Baillie Gifford
Worldwide Funds plc. BGE is a wholly owned subsidiary of Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited, which is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford & Co. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and Baillie Gifford & Co are authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority.
South Korea
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is licensed with the Financial Services Commission in South Korea as a cross border Discretionary Investment Manager and Non-discretionary Investment Adviser.
Japan
Mitsubishi UFJ Baillie Gifford Asset Management Limited (‘MUBGAM’) is a joint venture company between Mitsubishi UFJ Trust & Banking Corporation and Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited. MUBGAM is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Australia
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited (ARBN 118 567 178) is registered as a foreign company under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and holds Foreign Australian Financial Services Licence No 528911. This material is provided to you on the basis that you are a “wholesale client” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (“Corporations Act”). Please advise Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited immediately if you are not a wholesale client. In no circumstances may this material be made available to a “retail client” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This material contains general information only. It does not take into account any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs.
South Africa
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is registered as a Foreign Financial Services Provider with the Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa.
North America
Baillie Gifford International LLC is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited; it was formed in Delaware in 2005 and is registered with the SEC. It is the legal entity through which Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited provides client service and marketing functions in North America. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is registered with the SEC in the United States of America.
The Manager is not resident in Canada, its head office and principal place of business is in Edinburgh, Scotland. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is regulated in Canada as a portfolio manager and exempt market dealer with the Ontario Securities Commission ('OSC'). Its portfolio manager licence is currently passported into Alberta, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Newfoundland & Labrador whereas the exempt market dealer licence is passported across all Canadian provinces and territories. Baillie Gifford International LLC is regulated by the OSC as an exempt market and its licence is passported across all Canadian provinces and territories. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited (‘BGE’) relies on the International Investment Fund Manager Exemption in the provinces of Ontario and Quebec.
Israel
Baillie Gifford Overseas is not licensed under Israel’s Regulation of Investment Advising, Investment Marketing and Portfolio Management Law, 5755-1995 (the Advice Law) and does not carry insurance pursuant to the Advice Law. This material is only intended for those categories of Israeli residents who are qualified clients listed on the First Addendum to the Advice Law.
Singapore
Baillie Gifford Asia (Singapore) Private Limited is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as a holder of a capital markets services licence to conduct fund management activities for institutional investors and accredited investors in Singapore. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited, as a foreign related corporation of Baillie Gifford Asia (Singapore) Private Limited, has entered into a cross-border business arrangement with Baillie Gifford Asia (Singapore) Private Limited, and shall be relying upon the exemption under regulation 4 of the Securities and Futures (Exemption for Cross-Border Arrangements) (Foreign Related Corporations) Regulations 2021 which enables both Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and Baillie Gifford Asia (Singapore) Private Limited to market the full range of segregated mandate services to institutional investors and accredited investors in Singapore.
131206 10052443